Should Lukaku be sent out on loan?
Fulham and Stoke City are among the clubs interested in a loan deal for Romelu Lukaku.
But after the striker scored twice against Seattle Sounders, Chelsea boss Roberto Di Matteo made it clear he wanted to see more of him in action before making a decision on his future.
[poll id=”26″]
See also: Chelsea boss will not rush Lukaku decision
Follow West London Sport on Twitter
Find us on Facebook
19/07/2012 @ 9:16 pm
I voted no. My reason from day one of his signing i saw a lad wit potential and commitment to chelsea, we need to give him time. Wit the quality we now have in midfield, tell why lukaku won’t score anytime we call on him.
19/07/2012 @ 8:10 pm
Sell sturridge, get cavani, willian and ceasar. With this signings(cavani, willian, marin,hazard, ceasar,oscar, de brynep) plus de old guards(torres, lamps,ashley,rami,essien cech, terry, ferreira, etc, chelsea can go on with 2 or more seasons without signing any player
19/07/2012 @ 6:58 pm
Lukaku is a good player ,he needs more timeon the pitch to prove himself.why spending a huge money on another striker ?
19/07/2012 @ 6:35 pm
despite my vote chelseafc should not attach sentiment to our team and club reformation in order to defend our trophy from criticism and prejudices we need william to replace kalu and cavani to replace drogba remember we lost talents like anelka drogba kalu malouda balack and deco lets wake up and view the capacity of our competitors rather than awaiting humiliation of our profile we a team of reference now please my club owner club chairman and scouting manager stop selecting too much of green horn pros for cfc if possible pirlo.